I
hate all the crap people throw up about the Syrian refugees that are
about to be brought to Canada.
I
know you've heard this one; “We can't even take care of our own
homeless/veterans/poor and they should be first.”
Possibly,
but we aren't going to take care of them wither or not refugees are
let in. That's not how it works. It isn't a zero sum.
It's
like people giving to charity at Christmas. It might be nice if we
gave all year, but we don't. Some people get all preachy and loud
about it, but all such an argument does is discourage people from
being generous during the holidays. The overall effect is less for
the poor, so just shut up about it.
Denying
charity to the Syrian refugees doesn't mean more for Canada's
existing poor, it just means we'll be doing less good in general.
And
how did that argument about not taking care of Veterans creep in? Our
former government did all it could get away with in cutting back on
Veteran's care. That was before the Syrian crisis. It was a
deliberate policy by a right-wing government to screw over a
deserving portion of our population while cutting corporate and
wealth taxes. That party, although defeated, still got the second
largest portion of the vote. Not much voter outrage, it seems.
Or
how about this? If you are using the “take care of our own” angle
in your thinking, start writing to your MP and the PM telling them
that you want spending increased enough to take care of all our own
needy, and for Syrian refugees as well.
Think
we can't afford it? That's nonsense. We can afford what ever we
choose to. For the six years between 1939 and 1945 Canada put over a
million men and women into uniform, and maintained them with a
reasonable level of care, and paid them. This, at a time when our
total population was just over 11 million. There are currently over
three times as many of us, and if you think we can't find food and
beds for 20,000 Syrian refugees for a little while, you're nuts.
I
also really hate the anti-immigration argument that he foreigners are
coming to take our jobs. Economies don't work that way. Let's say a
country has a population of “x”, and they have “y” number
jobs. Double the population to “2x”, you end up with “2y”
jobs. Of course, the number of refugees coming in represents more
like 0.05 percent of our population, so the increase in jobs will
also be 0.05 percent. Granted, it is not instantaneous, but that's
how it really works.
People
also fear there are secret ISIS moles within the refugee population.
There just might be, but they are saying that we should refrain from
taking care of people that need help because we are afraid of a tiny
threat.
And
do you honestly think that an ISIS terrorist couldn't get to Canada
without hiding amongst the refugees? That really seems like a
ridiculously inefficient way to go about it.
Just
when did Canada become such a land of cowards?
France
was the victim of the recent attack, and they are refusing to be
scared into denying the refugees safe haven. Their attitude seems to
be that,“we decided to do what was right before we were attacked,
and if it was the right thing to do then, it still is now. We will
not be bullied into compromising our beliefs.”
No comments:
Post a Comment