Ronda
Rousey is the UFC's Womens Bantamweight champion. She pretty much
tosses her opponents around like rag-dolls, and typically twists
their arms until they pop off.
The
most ignorant comment that people make about her is usually the
question, “yeah, but could she beat a man?”
Of
course she can, she trains much more with men than with women. This
is usually countered with, “yeah, but those guys aren't going full
out. It's training.”
In
her mother, Dr. de Mars' blog of July 10, 2010 she mentions in
passing about Ronda doing two tournaments of which she, her mother,
disapproved.
Keep
in mind that this blog was a month before Ronda's amateur mma debut,
and 8 months before her first pro-mma fight.
It
seems Ronda fought in a local Judo tournament in the men's 180 pound
division a few years earlier. At the time, Ronda was about 150
pounds. She won. Granted, it was a local tournament, but the guys in
it were all trained, Black-Belt Judoka who were certainly going full
out.
She
had also fought in a local men's mma tournament shortly before the
blog entry, this time in the 170 pound division. She won.
Does
this mean that she could beat any man? Don't be silly. Even at her
own weight I don't think this is likely, but there are guys in the
top-ten at 135 pounds (Ronda's current fighting weight) that she
could whomp.
I
think what the, “could she beat a man,” crowd are saying is that
if there is even one guy out there that can beat her, then it means
women can't beat men.
It
somehow hurts their masculinity to think such an outrage could even
be possible.
The
female 100 meter record is 10.49 seconds. That means that she was
faster than every man that lived prior to 1921, and damn near every
man since then. Does it somehow comfort neanderthals to think that
because the male record is 9.58 seconds that somehow men are superior
to women?
I'm
pretty sure that elite female sprinters can outrun those guys, and
Ronda Rousey can certainly kick their butts.
No comments:
Post a Comment