There is a term used
for serious devotees; they are called fans.
I would say that the
American people are the biggest fans on earth.
They have their
chosen teams; often having favourites in each of many popular team
sports. The root of the word fan, is the more intense word, fanatic.
American sport fandom truly approaches the fanatical. Any loss can be
a cause of rage, and an important loss is a time for tears. They
scream at television screens across the nation on every game day.
They love their
teams with an incredible level of commitment. Often, they will follow
their team from cradle to the grave, longer than they are with any
spouse, parent, or child. It takes a lot for a team to break this
tie. Wins certainly don't do it, nor do losses. Criminal behaviour by
players is overlooked, as are cash grabs by management. About the
only thing that can end the affair is if a team leaves its home base
and relocates somewhere else far away.
I don't understand
or feel this kind of commitment to any sort of sports team, but I can
certainly see that it is a very real thing. One would have be blind
not to.
Even stranger to me,
is that Americans treat political figures and parties with the same
kind of fanaticism. They do it with the as much commitment and
intensity as they do their sports loyalty. This would be fine, except
that politics is a much more important endeavour.
Their 2016 election
is plagued by exactly this type of team loyalty.
The two sides are
called Republicans and Democrats. It is this way in every election,
and the outcome is largely decided by a very small category of voters
known as the undecided. This year it is quite different.
A while back, the
two teams picked their candidates, and they were Trump and Clinton.
The loyalty damage
hit right away. A lot of younger Democrat supporters had wanted
Bernie Sanders to be their party's representative, and in a huff
decided to vote for a third-party candidate. This would make some
sort of sense if the third-party choices were not
anti-everything-that-the-young-Democrats-liked-in-Sanders. Sanders
himself seems unable to convince them of this, although over time the
third-party candidates have been doing a pretty good job doing so all
on their own.
On the other side,
an even bigger split has been occurring. Typical Republican Party and
voter behaviour is to support their boy with pit bull-like intensity.
However, the candidate himself seems to be unlike any before. As the
months have gone by, a great many extremely stalwart Republicans have
felt themselves unable to support Trump. For example, there are two
living Republican former presidents. Neither publicly supports Trump,
which is unheard of.
Many other prominent
Republicans have also come out as not supporting Trump. Doing this
means that they are actually saying they want Clinton to win, which
is also unheard of. The list is growing constantly, and includes a
great many Congressmen, Senators, former presidential candidates,
Governors, party members, and other notables. There are likely more
than are known about, but who are doing so privately.
At the recent
debate, Trump did very poorly, and has since been acting very
unstable. He has been lashing out at irrelevant adversaries, and in
ways that weakens his own appeal.
It is becoming
harder and harder for Republican supporters, and even for Trump
fanatics to stick to the plan. Do you follow the official Republican
line that Trump is the one, or do you follow the significant part of
the party that says he isn't? Can you stick to Trump regardless, and
really think that you will be voting for an acceptable candidate?
It is like making
the decision to stop supporting a beloved football, baseball, or
basketball team, but also quite different. There can be something
noble about sticking with a team, and not abandoning them just
because they have been having major troubles, and have no chance of
winning. There is nothing noble about sticking with a candidate who
is having major troubles, wither they have a chance of winning or
not.
If the candidate is
turning out to be a horrid choice, sticking with them is exactly the
wrong thing to do. Doing so is even a worse decision if they actually
have a possibility of winning.
I think a great many
Trump supporters find themselves in just such a situation. I suspect
there is a great deal of soul searching going on right now, or at
least I hope there is.
There will always be
hard-core Trump fans who will vote for him on November 8th
regardless. They will do so even if it turns out he attends
Satanic religious services, gets arrested for rape, admits to incest,
is found to be on Russia's payroll, and is a drug addict, and
switches back to pro-choice, and to pro-gun-control, and admits he
actually isn't rich at all. “Trump all the way!”
It is the other
Trump supporters who are suffering right now. It is the ones who have
it in their DNA to stick with their candidate, but who are seeing too
many flaws in his behaviour and character. When do they pull the
plug? It certainly doesn't look like he's going to start looking
better between now and election day. When will enough be enough? What
if he is clearly the wrong man, they vote for him, and somehow he
manages to win? That would be the exact the opposite of an optimal
outcome.
I feel real empathy
for these people, and hope that they can reconcile everything in a
way that works for them, and for their country.
No comments:
Post a Comment